Copyright Litigation Attorney Serving Photographers

"Fighting Against Infringement and Theft"

MALAKAUSKAS LAW, APC

Blog About The Attorney
What Is The Most Important Thing You Can Do As A Photographer? How Do You Stop Someone From Using Your Photograph? What Are Damages For Copyright Cases? How Long Do You Have To Sue For Copyright Infringement? What Is The Difference Between The Digital Millennium Copyright Act And The Copyright Act Of 1976?

ISN’T FILING A COPYRIGHT LAWSUIT TIME CONSUMING?

For the photographer, a copyright lawsuit is usually not time consuming. Less than two percent (2%) of all copyright cases go to trial. That means over ninety-eight percent (98%) of copyright cases settle. Some cases even settle before a lawsuit is even filed. Other cases settle shortly after a lawsuit is filed. Unfortunately, there are some cases that can take a substantial amount of time to reach resolution. However, even in those cases, it is the attorney, and not the photographer, who spends their time on the case.

The physical presence of a photographer is usually only required in three situations: 1) depositions; 2) mediation or settlement conferences; and 3) trials.

Therefore, as a photographer, you will not be burdened with your copyright lawsuit and will be able to focus on your own passions and work. Don’t let the feeling of not having enough time prevent you from protecting your rights.

YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO COMPENSATION. CALL NOW TO FIND OUT.

Feeling overwhelmed? Not yet ready to call? The links below will help answer some of your questions. Feel free to gain more information and feel more comfortable.

CLICK BELOW FOR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS:

The links below provide detailed information to commonly asked questions. Click below:

You are already reading this as you desire information, but why browse endless web pages looking for answers? Get the answers now. Call 866-790-2242 now for your free consultation.

(c)Malakauskas Law, APC. Attorney Advertisement. This website shall not be construed as legal advice and is for informational purposes only. Each and every case is different and requires an attorney to examine the specific case in question to arrive at an adequate legal conclusion. Consult with your own personal attorney for more information on the subject matters.

These blogposts shall not be constituted as legal advice and are for informational purposes only. Each and every case is different and requires an attorney to examine the specific case in question to arrive at an adequate legal conclusion. In addition, these blogposts are not updated, or edited, after the date of their initial post, and as such, the information contained within them may be outdated. Consult with your own personal attorney for more information on the subject matters.